Background color
Myth 1

Myth #1

A physical air gap is a fail-safe security guarantee

Background color

Myth #2

An air gap requires physical isolation

Background color

Myth #3

A physical air gap is always better than a virtual one

close
Myth 1

Myth #1

This is a myth because physical air gapping is vulnerable due to people. After all, air-gapped backup data stores require people to set them up and transfer data to them. If anyone in the process is not trusted, the entire system becomes suspect. This is why air gapping should be used as an extra step in the process of protecting data, not the only method.

There’s also the risk of unknown connections that may exist. Supposedly, a traditional air gapped backup is isolated and incapable of connecting wirelessly or physically with other devices. But sometimes, a backup thought to be air gapped is actually on the network. This can be because of human error, miscommunication, or poor documentation. This undermines the effectiveness of air gapping.

Finally, even the most rigidly air-gapped system needs an access point to modify or delete data—and there is always the possibility that it could be accessed by a bad actor or perhaps mistakenly exposed by a well-meaning but careless authorized user. Either way, the risk exists.

Myth #2

The notion that only physical isolation creates an air gap is also a myth. A virtual air gap is another way to separate and protect data that is virtually connected to the network. It works by using a temporary (and strongly authenticated) access bridge along with immutability and encryption in case a cyberattack gets through.

Myth #3

As noted, a traditional physical air gap can possess vulnerabilities. Yet even assuming it is done well, a traditional air gap isn’t more effective than a virtual one.

That’s because physical air gaps have limitations. They cost more and are difficult to manage, as everything must be done manually. They also can’t meet aggressive RTOs and RPOs because data has to be manually moved across the air gap. Physical air gaps also are not protected against attacks by malicious insiders—and basic human nature to make mistakes.

A virtual air gap offers the same benefits as a physical air gap but at dramatically less cost and faster SLAs. By adding immutability and encryption to the mix, virtual air gaps remain secure even if a cybercriminal outsmarts the virtual connection to the data store.