Background color
Myth 1

Myth #1

A physical air gap is a fail-safe security guarantee

Background color

Myth #2

An air gap requires physical isolation

Background color

Myth #3

A physical air gap is always better than a virtual one

close
Myth 1

Myth #1

This is a myth because physical air gapping is vulnerable due to people. After all, air-gapped backup data stores require people to set them up and transfer data to them. If anyone in the process is not trusted, the entire system becomes suspect. This is why air gapping should be used as an extra step in the process of protecting data, not the only method.

There’s also the risk of unknown connections that may exist. Supposedly, a traditional air gapped backup is isolated and incapable of connecting wirelessly or physically with other devices. But sometimes, a backup thought to be air gapped is actually on the network. This can be because of human error, miscommunication, or poor documentation. This undermines the effectiveness of air gapping.

Finally, even the most rigidly air-gapped system needs an access point to modify or delete data—and there is always the possibility that it could be accessed by a bad actor or perhaps mistakenly exposed by a well-meaning but careless authorized user. Either way, the risk exists.